ICYMI: They Call This ‘Art’? Tennessee Exhibit Features Trump with KKK Hood and Swastikas
An art exhibit at a college in Tennessee featuring Trump, swastikas, and Klan hoods sparks outrage from lawmakers and students alike. đ #News #JohnsonCityTN #Tennessee #Art
JOHNSON CITY, TN – A politically charged art exhibit at East Tennessee State University (ETSU) has sparked a firestorm of controversy, drawing criticism from Republican lawmakers and students alike. The exhibition, housed at the Reece Museum on the universityâs campus, features depictions of political figures, including Donald Trump, alongside symbols of hate such as swastikas and Ku Klux Klan hoods. The imagery has led to calls for the exhibit to be shut down, with many arguing that it crosses the line into divisive propaganda.
The Controversial Artwork at ETSU
The 2024 Fletcher Exhibit, an annual display showcasing works exploring societal and political issues, has become the center of heated debate. This year’s exhibit includes paintings that tie conservative figures to extremist ideologies.
One piece, which portrays House Speaker Mike Johnson with a swastika transforming into a Christian cross, has been especially contentious.
Another artwork features the American flag stitched into the shape of a KKK hood. These pieces, along with others comparing prominent conservatives to fascists, have ignited outrage, particularly among Republican lawmakers.
The exhibit was created to encourage artistic responses to pressing political and social concerns, but the intense nature of the works has stirred feelings of anger and discomfort. Many of the paintings seem to equate figures like Trump with Adolf Hitler, and others connect right-wing Christian groups with fascist movements.
The controversial nature of these depictions has drawn harsh criticism, with several lawmakers demanding the artwork be removed before its scheduled conclusion on December 6.
Lawmakers Demand Immediate Action
Republican lawmakers have expressed strong condemnation of the artwork, with some even calling for the university to terminate the exhibit immediately. U.S. Representative Tim Burchett, who represents Tennessee, voiced his deep concerns about the paintings, arguing that they were offensive and hateful. He, along with other Republican figures, believes the works cross the line into dangerous left-wing propaganda.
State Senator Rusty Crowe joined the chorus of disapproval, stating that while Americans have the right to free speech, such artwork has consequences. He suggested that the individuals responsible for approving the exhibit should face consequences, as the display is harmful to the values of the local community.
Additionally, U.S. Representative Diana Harshbarger criticized the painting of Speaker Johnson, calling it an “abhorrent mockery” of her faith and a harmful symbol associating her colleagues with hate.
Artist Defends His Work Amid Backlash
Joel Gibbs, the so-called ‘artist’ behind the controversial painting of Speaker Mike Johnson, has responded to the backlash with surprise. He argues that both sides of the political spectrum had equal opportunities to submit artwork and that his piece was merely a reflection of his own views on contemporary conservatism and Christianity.
Gibbs explained that his painting, titled âEvolution,â is intended as a large political cartoon, which aims to highlight what he perceives as the growing influence of fascism in the U.S. through extreme right-wing Christian groups.
Gibbsâ defense underscores his belief in the value of free expression, asserting that art serves as a platform for political dialogue. He encourages those who disagree with the message of his artwork to create their own pieces in response, rather than simply demanding the removal of his work.
Mixed Reactions from ETSU Students
The exhibit has also drawn mixed reactions from ETSU students. Some have supported the calls for the exhibitâs closure, believing that while the artwork may be an expression of raw emotion, it goes too far in its depiction of political figures. One student acknowledged that while the artwork represents the artistâs feelings, it has crossed a line that makes many uncomfortable.
However, others have defended the exhibit, arguing that it is a legitimate form of political expression that should be protected. They believe that such displays, even if provocative, are an essential part of the open exchange of ideas that a university setting encourages.
University President Addresses the Controversy
University President Brian Noland has weighed in on the matter, acknowledging that he personally finds the artwork disturbing. While he shares the concerns expressed by lawmakers and some students, he stated that state laws require the university to allow such expressions on campus.
Noland also mentioned that he would be reviewing the process by which guest artists and third-party groups are permitted to present their work at the university. His comments suggest that there will be further examination of how such controversial displays are handled in the future.
The debate surrounding the Fletcher Exhibit has become emblematic of the larger national conversation about free speech, political expression, and the role of art in university settings. As the exhibitâs closing date approaches, the controversy is unlikely to subside, leaving questions about the balance between free expression and community values still unresolved.
As our beautiful country grapples with rising tensions, itâs crucial to find ways to engage in meaningful dialogue and bridge our divides. While free expression remains vital, unity can only be achieved through understanding and respect, rather than through further polarization. The path forward requires all Americans to come together, fostering conversations that heal rather than deepen the divide.
RELATED TOPICS: Politics | Tennessee
Sign Up for Our Newsletter
We value your feedback! Did you find this article informative, inspiring, or thought-provoking? Leave a comment below and join the discussion. We appreciate your opinion and look forward to hearing from you!
Keep it in place. Art is to stimulate different ideas. Hitler hated modern art.
Good morning, Chery! That’s a good point – thank you đ We hope you have a great day! – Jack and Kitty