Why Minnesota’s lakes have such puzzling names—and what their order reveals about history, language, and culture.

The Strange Truth About Minnesota’s Lake Names: Why Some Put ‘Lake’ First and Others Last

Why Minnesota’s lakes have such puzzling names—and what their order reveals about history, language, and culture. 🌐 #News #StPaulMN #Minnesota #Lifestyle

ST. PAUL, MN – Imagine standing on the shores of Lake Minnetonka or Long Lake. Have you ever wondered why some lakes in Minnesota put “Lake” before the name while others flip the order? It’s a subtle detail that many overlook, but it has sparked curiosity among researchers who study the naming conventions of bodies of water. This seemingly small difference reveals fascinating patterns rooted in language, geography, and history.

My goofy hubby Jack says there’s a simple explanation: Ole named half of the lakes and his wife Lena named the other half. They didn’t notice the mistake until it was to late. Something tells me that Jack’s answer isn’t correct, so I dug deep to get the bottom of this murky Minnesota mystery. My research involved reading old newspapers and eating lots of tater tot hotdish. Let’s dive into why the word “Lake” sometimes leads the name and sometimes trails behind.

The Great Debate: ‘Lake Name’ vs. ‘Name Lake’

In the United States, there are no strict rules governing whether “Lake” comes first or second in a name. This flexibility has resulted in names like Lake Vermilion, Cedar Lake, and countless others that mix and match the structure.

Researchers have investigated why this inconsistency exists. They propose that lake size and historical settlement patterns play key roles. Larger lakes, like the Great Lakes, often have “Lake” placed first to emphasize their prominence. In contrast, smaller or lesser-known lakes more commonly follow the “Name Lake” format.

Language and Settler Influence

History offers another clue. Regions colonized by French and Spanish settlers often follow naming conventions where “Lake” comes first, as seen in French terms like Lac d’Annecy or Spanish names like Lago de Chapala. In contrast, areas settled by English and German speakers tend to place “Lake” second, consistent with terms like England’s Windermere or Germany’s Wannsee.

This linguistic influence explains some regional patterns in the United States. States like Louisiana and Florida, shaped by French and Spanish colonization, favor “Lake Name.” In New England, where English settlers dominated, “Name Lake” is far more common. Minnesota, a melting pot of influences, reflects both traditions.

A Minnesota Mystery

In Minnesota, researchers found that about 90% of lakes follow the “Name Lake” structure, while 10% use “Lake Name.” Early French explorers likely introduced names where “Lake” came first, but later European settlers brought their own conventions, resulting in the mix seen today.

Some lakes also retain names from the Dakota and Ojibwe languages. For instance, Bde Maka Ska translates to “Lake Earth White” in Dakota, while Mille Lacs, derived from Ojibwe, means “the lake that spreads all over.” In these Indigenous naming systems, descriptors often come first, followed by the term for “lake.”

No Rules, Just Preferences

When it comes to official lake names, there are no strict guidelines. According to state officials, the placement of “Lake” often depends on local preferences or the unique characteristics of the lake. Larger, more notable lakes, such as Lake Superior, often have “Lake” leading the name, while smaller lakes may not.

Interestingly, some names are inconsistent or redundant. Mille Lacs Lake, for example, translates to “Thousand Lakes Lake” in French, an unintended quirk that has persisted over time.

Exceptions That Defy Patterns

Despite the clear influence of language and history, some states defy expectations. In parts of the Eastern Seaboard, where English settlers would suggest a dominance of “Name Lake” names, many lakes actually follow the “Lake Name” format. The reasons for these outliers remain unclear, leaving room for further exploration by historians and linguists.

This mix of historical and linguistic factors reveals how lake names, whether “Lake Minnetonka” or “Long Lake,” carry stories of the people and cultures that shaped them. Minnesota’s lakes are more than just places—they’re reflections of a rich and varied past. Ok, back to my tater tot hotdish.

RELATED TOPICS: Minnesota

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

SHARE This Article With Family And Friends…

Leave a Friendly Comment or Thought